Is Pasteurization More Of A Health Risk Or A Safety Benefit? Read This, Then You Tell Us What You Think!

taught as early as elementary school about themilk is whether or not the milk is able to retain its
French chemist Louis Pasteur and his famousnutritional value after the high temperatures it is
invention: pasteurization. This is the process ofexposed to. Proponents of pasteurization say the
heating food to kill bacteria, viruses, mold, yeasts andprocess has little effect on the milk's nutritional value
other potentially harmful organisms.or flavor.
The first pasteurization test was performed back in"Milk is a good source of the vitamins thiamine, folate,
1862, after Pasteur noticed that microorganisms couldB-12, and riboflavin, and pasteurization results in losses
contaminate beverages (he later extended this toof anywhere from zero to 10 percent for each of
the theory that microorganisms could contaminatethese, which most would consider only a marginal
humans and animals as well.). But pasteurization didreduction," says Sheehan.
not immediately become the gold standard for milkFurther, "Pasteurization will destroy some enzymes,"
production in the United States.says Barbara Ingham, Ph.D., associate professor and
In fact, at the end of the 19th century "swill dairies,"extension food scientist at the University of
in which cows were raised in horrible conditions andWisconsin-Madison. "But the enzymes that are
reportedly fed swill from liquor distilleries, were anaturally present in milk are bovine enzymes. Our
major problem. The milk from these dairies was ofbodies don't use animal enzymes to help metabolize
such poor quality that it was thought to becalcium and other nutrients."
contributing to the high death rate of urban infants atThe Case for Raw Milk
the time (the yearly death rate of U.S. infants in citiesOn the other side of the fence are those who say
was about half of the yearly birth rate).pasteurization is unnecessary if cows are raised in
Thus, a crusade began for certified rawclean environments, and radically changes the
(unpasteurized) milk, which would ensure certainstructure of the milk, resulting in an entirely different,
purity levels of milk and regular inspections of dairies.and potentially harmful, food. According to the
"Though more and more milk was being pasteurized,Weston A. Price Foundation:
pasteurization was seen by many as a stopgap"Pasteurization destroys enzymes, diminishes vitamin
measure that would no longer be needed once thecontent, denatures fragile milk proteins, destroys
production and distribution of milk was more carefullyvitamins C, B12 and B6, kills beneficial bacteria,
regulated. Certified milk was the model for thepromotes pathogens and is associated with allergies,
production of better milk everywhere," said Ronincreased tooth decay, colic in infants, growth
Schmid, ND, author of The Untold Story of Milk.problems in children, osteoporosis, arthritis, heart
Yet by the early 20th century, milk supplies were stilldisease and cancer. Calves fed pasteurized milk do
of poor quality, and thought to be involved in manypoorly and many die before maturity. Raw milk sours
disease outbreaks, leading authorities to push fornaturally but pasteurized milk turns putrid; processors
mandatory pasteurization of all milk except certifiedmust remove slime and pus from pasteurized milk by
raw milk.a process of centrifugal clarification."
"Not until the 1930s did commercial dairy interests,Raw milk, proponents say, is an outstanding source
segments of the medical community, politicians andof beneficial bacteria such as lactobacillus acidolphilus,
public health agency officials and their allies in thevitamins, enzmes and calcium. Further, they say that
media begin a campaign first to smear all raw milksickness resulting from raw milk is rare--instead, it is
and then to eliminate its availability and sale," Schmidpasteurized milk that is often implicated in outbreaks
said.of food-borne illness.
Thus began the compulsory pasteurization of milkAccording to Mark McAfee, founder of Organic
and the great debate that has spanned centuries: IsPastures Dairy, which produces a full line of raw
pasteurization one of the greatest discoveries, ororganic dairy products for retail sale, "During the
greatest setbacks, of our time?period 2000 through 2004 there were several
The Case for Pasteurizationlisteria-related food recalls in California associated with
"[Drinking raw milk is] like playing Russian roulette withpasteurized milk products and ice cream. During this
your health," says John Sheehan, director of thesame period more than 12 million servings of Organic
Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) Division ofPastures products were consumed and not one
Dairy and Egg Safety. "We see a number of cases ofperson complained of illness and not one pathogen
food-borne illness every year related to thewas ever found either by the state, FDA or Organic
consumption of raw milk."Pastures."
According to the FDA, raw milk may contain anyOrganic Pastures then hired a laboratory to perform
number of disease-causing organisms, includingan experiment. The lab added 10 million counts of
campylobacter, escherichia, listeria, salmonella, yersiniapathogens to one-milliliter samples of organic raw milk
and brucella. Aside from causing acute diarrhea,and found that the pathogens not only would not
stomach cramps, vomiting and fever, thesegrow but they also died off. The lab concluded: " ...
organisms may also cause more serious conditions,Organic raw milk and colostrum do not appear to
particularly among the elderly, pregnant women,support the growth of pathogens ..."
children or those with weakened immune systems.As it stands, the sale of raw milk across state lines is
The FDA says pasteurization helps prevent:illegal. However, sales of raw milk, either in retail
Tuberculosis Diphtheria Polio Salmonellosis Strepstores or directly from the farm, are legal within 28
throat Scarlet fever Typhoid feverU.S. states. In other states, raw milk may be available
Milk can be contaminated from a sick or dirty animal,through cow "leasing" programs in which members
as well as by dirty living environments. "Think aboutpurchase shares of a cow and can then use the milk
how many times a cow lays down in a field or thehow they choose. l"> Please Let Us Know What
barn," says Tom Szalkucki, assistant director of theYOU Think!
Wisconsin Center for Dairy Research at theSelect answers will be published in the forthcoming
University of Wisconsin-Madison. "Even if the barn isissue of the e-newsletter!* *NOTE: Your answer, or
cleaned thoroughly and regularly, it's not steamed.an excerpt thereof, may be published in a
Contamination can take place because it's not aforthcoming issue of the e-newsletter and on the
sterile environment."website. By submitting your answer you authorize
Pasteurization, says the FDA, kills any dangerousthis. Please include your name and your city state (or
bacteria while also destroying bacteria that can causecountry) location to be included in the publication of
milk to spoil, thereby extending shelf life.select answers!
One of the biggest controversies over pasteurized